For the letters that cannot be issued electronically, it will be sent by ordinary post and you may be charged a fee for this service. The outcome letters can be confirmed online by entering the application details on the Assessment Outcome Verification page.
The first step is to choose your assessment pathway. There are six pathways for migration skills assessment. Engineers Australia requires evidence of English language proficiency if you are applying to have your skills assessed.
Yes, you can still submit an application. Please keep in mind that work experience is not a requirement. Please note that before applying through the Accredited Qualifications pathway, you must ensure that your qualification is an accredited program.
If your qualification is later shown to be unaccredited, there will be no refund. You can choose the Fast Track service option while submitting your application, or you can submit your Fast Track service request online after it has been submitted.
Engineers Australia Assessment Validity. Things to prepare before Applying for EA Assessment. Need to assess your engineering qualification for migration purposes. If the assessment is successful, an assessment outcome letter suitable for migration purposes will be sent to you by email. The outcome letter can be verified online by entering the application details here.
Please note that from the perspective of Engineers Australia, the assessment letter has no expiry date. However, we are aware that the Department of Home Affairs validity policy may vary from this.
As such, if the Department of Home Affairs requests an updated letter, please contact Engineers Australia for instructions. In the case that you are searching for Skilled Migration to Australia , at that point you should acquire positive skill evaluation result first before applying for the visa. The couple needs to obtain Tasmanian sponsorship for the new visas and everything is on track except for one major obstacle, obtaining positive skill assessment from Engineers Australia.
Pooja has tried twice for her skill assessment as an Electronics Engineer to be assessed. She has been refused twice and received a one year ban from re-applying, twice.
Pooja strongly denies this accusation. In her lastest refusal letter in October , EA made the following claim;. Engineers Australia have identified that one or more of your career episodes have been copied — either from internet sources, publications or career episodes previously submitted to Engineers Australia. Engineers Australia have also identified that some of the submitted documents in support of Migration Skills Assessment are misleading.
The letter provided no details of what part of her CDR they are referring to nor any indication of what documents that they believe are misleading. EA then go on to say;. Consequently, your application is rejected and a Twelve Month ban has been imposed.
We advise that relevant information about your case may be passed on to the Department of Home Affairs for further investigation.
When Pooja received this letter she felt devastated. In tears, Pooja explained, I have since learned that recently a male international student was accused of the same thing by EA and he only received a warning letter, but EA has banned me twice. Pooja came to my office after she received the second refusal.
Unfortunately, we have seen many letters like these from EA which basically all basically say the same thing. Many students admit they had made a mistake and in the past, we advised best to wait it out and apply again without the mistakes. So how did EA come to the same conclusion? It is also impossible to fathom why one male international student receives just a warning letter but Pooja receives two 1 year bans.
0コメント