By means of his "methodic doubt," Descartes is able to show that there is one thing we can know with absolute certainty --namely, that we cannot know anything with certainty. The phrase originally appeared in French as je pense, donc je suis in his Discourse on the Method, so as to reach a wider audience than Latin would have allowed. Cogito, ergo sum. It is the only statement to survive the test of his methodic doubt.
The Second Meditation is subtitled "The nature of the human mind, and how it is better known than the body" and takes place the day after the First Meditation. He has also noted that the physical world does not exist, which might also seem to imply his nonexistence. And yet to have these doubts, he must exist. Descartes proposes a method of inquiry that is modeled after mathematics The method is made of four rules : a- Accept ideas as true and justified only if they are self-evident.
Perhaps, then, the Method of Doubt is, in some sense, too successful for Descartes to be able to arrive at useful knowledge. Even nearly four centuries later, there isn't a universally accepted solution for establishing the existence of the external world on the basis of the Method of Doubt.
If educators ought to aim at having their students acquire knowledge, their epistemic aims are related to this goal. Why did Descartes doubt his senses? Category: science space and astronomy. Descartes first invokes the errors of the senses in the Meditations to generate doubt ; he suggests that because the senses sometimes deceive, we have reason not to trust them.
Can we trust our senses? This inspection can be imperfect and confused, as it was before, or clear and distinct, as it is now, depending on how closely I pay attention to the things in which the piece of wax consists Section So even though my senses have revealed the wax to me in different forms my mind has always, by processes independent of my senses, understood the essence of the wax and that it may be presented by the senses in differing ways.
Note that Descartes does not state that the senses have no value, only that understanding is the function of the mind rather than of the senses. It might be said that if one hopes to understand something even a physical thing it must be done by the mind rather than relying only on the senses. But meanwhile I marvel at how prone my mind is to errors For we say that we see the wax itself, if it is present, and not that we judge it to be present from its color or shape Section In our common speech we turn around the relationship between cognition and sensory perception.
Similarly, Descartes points out that I might look out the window and say that I see a person walking by when all I have seen is a hat and some clothing which may be concealing a robot.
I use my mind to form a judgment that what I saw was a person, even though I did not actually see a person Section Note that nothing in his argument denies the existence of the sensory input, in fact the senses provide the raw material for the operations which the mind performs.
When did I have a more perfect knowledge of the wax? Only after I have diligently examined both what the wax is and how it is known. But indeed when I distinguish the wax from its external forms, as if stripping it of its clothing, and look at the wax in its nakedness, then, even though there can still be an error in my judgment, nevertheless I cannot perceive it thus without a human mind Section Here Descartes is still speaking of a role for the senses how it is known , and its external forms in forming a proper perception of the wax.
Furthermore, if my perception of the wax seemed much more distinct after it became known to me not only on account of sight or touch, but on account of many reasons, one has to admit how much more distinctly I am now known to myself. For there is not a single consideration that can aid in my perception of the wax or of any other body that fails to make even more manifest the nature of my mind Section Once again Descartes speaks of the wax in terms of both the senses and reason.
For since I now know that even bodies are not, properly speaking, perceived by the senses or by the faculty of imagination, but by the intellect alone solo intellectu percipi , and that they are not perceived percipi through their being touched or seen, but only through their being understood, I manifestly know that nothing can be perceived more easily than my own mind Section It might seem that Descartes wants to abandon any role for the senses now that he has arrived at his conclusion, but this summary is intended not to say that sensory perception has no value, rather cogitation has greater value.
His point is that although it might seem easier to understand things which can be directly observed by the senses, the example of the wax demonstrates that thinking inspection by the mind is the better way to know physical objects which, if they have real existence, exist outside the mind; and consequently even more so the mind itself and it contents. The example of the wax is an effective one to demonstrate the difficulty of relying upon our senses for an understanding of the world around us.
On what can be doubted. Descartes begins the First Meditation by noting that there are many things he once believed to be true that he has later learned were not. This leads him to worry which of his other beliefs might also be false. So, Descartes is searching for something certain, something that cannot be doubted. In order to find this kind of certainty, he sets out to doubt everything he can.
Given that Descartes has indefinitely many beliefs, calling each of them into question one by one would take forever, so he instead tries to cast doubt on an entire source of beliefs, namely, the senses.
Is it possible that the senses, as a whole, are an unreliable source of information? This might seem implausible at first blush, given how much confidence we typically have in our own sense experiences. So, he attempts to undermine this confidence in a number of successively stronger challenges to our justification in believing what our senses tell us.
First attack: We know that when we dream, we have experiences that at least seem like sense experiences when we have them, but that do not provide accurate information about the world we seem to be experiencing. If I dreaming right now, then I am laying down somewhere, and not seated in front of my computer. So, am I dreaming right now?
How is that? Remember that all that Descartes has done at this point is to undermine my confidence that I am now awake and not dreaming. That is just what dreams are.
Descartes begins Part I of the Principles by calling all of our beliefs into doubt. This exercise is meant to free us from our reliance on the senses, so that we can begin to contemplate purely intellectual truths. The doubting is initiated in two stages. In the first stage, all the beliefs we have ever received from sensory perceptions are called into doubt. In the second stage, even our intellectual beliefs are called into doubt. Descartes presents two reasons for doubting that our sensory perceptions tell us the truth.
First of all, our senses have been known to deceive us. Examples of the sort of systematic deception he has in mind here include phenomena such as the bent appearance of a straight stick when viewed in water and the optical illusion of smallness created by distance.
0コメント